Some while ago we received a curious attempt to make a posting on the Angels in Canada Facebook page. It simply said SARAH FONTENOT. It meant nothing to us, so I replied to the poster asking if he could explain. He replied as follows:
"Sarah is a girl in Los Angeles, who I believe is an angel..... (She's beautiful)...... She comes from Canada..... lol..... Sorry if you didn't want your name attached to this..... :-)"
Of course we didn't mind our names being attached to it if only because you cannot actually post to our page, so nobody ever saw the name! In fact we were rather amused that the young man had made this (perhaps) romantic gesture. I would like to imagine that he had followed his belief by doing a search on something like 'angels from Canada' found us and interpreted our title somewhat literally without doing further research.
However, I was in two minds over whether or not to explain that however beautiful she may be, and however wonderful, Sarah could not possibly be an angel. In truth, the belief in earthbound Angels in human form is something I've come across several times before, most notably when a guy at a Mind, Body, Spirit Expo actually introduced himself to me as one. This declaration was immediately followed by a rebuttal from my (not really) winged friends. In fact, all along the etheric has made it quite clear to me that when they are able to incarnate, they never do so as humans. Their appearance in human form is rare, brief and only ever for the purpose of preserving life 'in extremis', or for making some vital learning point. I elected not to burst my correspondent's bubble.
Nonetheless, it got me thinking about why Angels would not incarnate in human form. I already knew it was something to do with freewill, but still felt the need to seek clarification. The response was quite revealing...
Irrespective of the form it takes, if an angelic being physically incarnates it brings with it a far higher level of 'light energy' than would a 'normal' carbon based lifeform. This affords the potential to manifest with an ease not normally experienced by other incarnate lifeforms. If duality may be seen in all things, human beings represent a 'no holds barred' position on a scale measuring ability to use freewill; whereas other lifeforms, to varying degrees, may be the recipient of intercessions from their higher selves. This, apparently, is sacrosanct and unwavering. If an angel were to incarnate as a human, they would therefore be unbridled in both their ability to create, and their freedom to do so, with no direct opportunity to intervene to effect their choices. Since memory of purpose is completely lost upon incarnation, an angel in human form could, if subjected to corruption of any kind, become something akin to a wolf in sheep's clothing, and have the potential to do great damage. Just as Angels incarnating as animals lose their consciousness of what they are and become the avatar form they have assumed, so they would if they become human. It is all too easy for us to look upon Angels as being perfect beings, without flaw or failing (and they are, when in their angelic form). It is precisely for this reason that humans, who are merely an extrapolation from angelic beings in the first place, are intended to be flawed so that they may experience all of the parameters of the possible. But to be both angel and human at the same time... the risk is too great for this to be allowed and hence Sarah Fontenot is, sadly, not an angel.
There was a further comment made by AA Michael. My correspondent had referred to Sarah as being 'beautiful'. The big angel found this curious. "Why would your concept of beauty define how an angel would look?" he wondered. "From our perspective, all form has beauty."
So now you know!
"Sarah is a girl in Los Angeles, who I believe is an angel..... (She's beautiful)...... She comes from Canada..... lol..... Sorry if you didn't want your name attached to this..... :-)"
Of course we didn't mind our names being attached to it if only because you cannot actually post to our page, so nobody ever saw the name! In fact we were rather amused that the young man had made this (perhaps) romantic gesture. I would like to imagine that he had followed his belief by doing a search on something like 'angels from Canada' found us and interpreted our title somewhat literally without doing further research.
However, I was in two minds over whether or not to explain that however beautiful she may be, and however wonderful, Sarah could not possibly be an angel. In truth, the belief in earthbound Angels in human form is something I've come across several times before, most notably when a guy at a Mind, Body, Spirit Expo actually introduced himself to me as one. This declaration was immediately followed by a rebuttal from my (not really) winged friends. In fact, all along the etheric has made it quite clear to me that when they are able to incarnate, they never do so as humans. Their appearance in human form is rare, brief and only ever for the purpose of preserving life 'in extremis', or for making some vital learning point. I elected not to burst my correspondent's bubble.
Nonetheless, it got me thinking about why Angels would not incarnate in human form. I already knew it was something to do with freewill, but still felt the need to seek clarification. The response was quite revealing...
Irrespective of the form it takes, if an angelic being physically incarnates it brings with it a far higher level of 'light energy' than would a 'normal' carbon based lifeform. This affords the potential to manifest with an ease not normally experienced by other incarnate lifeforms. If duality may be seen in all things, human beings represent a 'no holds barred' position on a scale measuring ability to use freewill; whereas other lifeforms, to varying degrees, may be the recipient of intercessions from their higher selves. This, apparently, is sacrosanct and unwavering. If an angel were to incarnate as a human, they would therefore be unbridled in both their ability to create, and their freedom to do so, with no direct opportunity to intervene to effect their choices. Since memory of purpose is completely lost upon incarnation, an angel in human form could, if subjected to corruption of any kind, become something akin to a wolf in sheep's clothing, and have the potential to do great damage. Just as Angels incarnating as animals lose their consciousness of what they are and become the avatar form they have assumed, so they would if they become human. It is all too easy for us to look upon Angels as being perfect beings, without flaw or failing (and they are, when in their angelic form). It is precisely for this reason that humans, who are merely an extrapolation from angelic beings in the first place, are intended to be flawed so that they may experience all of the parameters of the possible. But to be both angel and human at the same time... the risk is too great for this to be allowed and hence Sarah Fontenot is, sadly, not an angel.
There was a further comment made by AA Michael. My correspondent had referred to Sarah as being 'beautiful'. The big angel found this curious. "Why would your concept of beauty define how an angel would look?" he wondered. "From our perspective, all form has beauty."
So now you know!